Thank you for the link and response. The noted issues surrounding tungsten and solutions to solve them seem to have set up an interesting state of FF-1. What issues can be anticipated with Beryllium from what has been learned so far from tungsten is an interesting question. Could dust become an issue?
Rocket Surgeon – Are you using the information for science fiction? or fiction about science? How would Hydrogen 3, as in tritium be beneficial to the process of energy generation, if pB-11 is a step above?
The transfer to electricity seems to solve many other issues in current generation scenarios in both space travel and providing a mechanism for lifting payloads into space. DPF also solves the expense immediate problem of infrastructure costs. Upgrading the power grid becomes null, thus distributive small power plants and a paced roll-out of a secure grid occurs. The age of the 500 mega watt $10 billion dollar facility will fade away. Research into trillion dollar facilities will also be dropped, hopefully. Miniaturization would be nice, but not yet understood or realistic.
The need to read not speed. 🙂
Notes: I don’t see a forum page in the design templates. Will they be under a different label?
The educational discussion is still not on the table is it? Is it true that most of your visitors are on the high end of understanding plasma science?
Do you look at it from a perspective of the next generation’s understanding of this science?
I know there have been links to other sites that are educational, but they seem to be at a very high level of physics.
Historical references in an educational approach could provide information that comes directly from this website. It will also provide a basic form of marketing.
I followed the links on the post of 13 December 2015
It would be nice to read articles that had dates posted on them. We have seen many articles that discuss arcing before and other issues. A date posted would ensure that the article is the most recent.
Thank you.
Actually, if it is that repulsive and complete garbage, I could see where the whole thread should be deleted. It is good to find garbage and debunk it with strong scientific factual arguments. There are too many (uninformed) people running around asking questions about stuff like this, and it is rarely given a definitive answer, as to why it is crap. I realize experts have more important things to do than work up a small paragraph to state why mysticism and poor science creates many bad Public Relations nightmares on science. Putting a fire out before it grows is also important.
Sorry for asking experts.
Does sequestration have an inherent problem? When you put all that CO2 some place, it would seem sooner or later it would need to come out. Just like a melt-down or an accidental release of radioactive clouds. If sequestration is a choice, then wouldn’t processing into separate elements be a step to a solution? Just a weird thought.
Do you mean a camcorder and recommended microphone? Either way, that is great.
From the way some of the images were laid out, it was hard to tell. It seems more people have trouble with facts and the truth. I always try to be very far about people who don’t check their facts. What comes around goes… But, everyone makes a mistake once in awhile. They probably shouldn’t produce a film like that, unless it is fictional in nature. I was going research to see who the “money” backers were. Zapkitty, do you know?
Olympus – Digital Voice Recorder
Model: DM-620
SKU: 2506298
Customer Rating:
5.0 (1 customer review) $149.00
Anything that is recorded on this voice recorder can be synchronized with video. I have the software to do it. A good digital camcorder with sound will help to get the lips in sync. You drop the sound from the camcorder and use the pocket recorder sound instead. Send me the cd/DVD and I can put them together.