[pluto]

Hello one and all

One can talk about the BB until you go blue in the face and yet the BBT has no foundation, no evidence to support it.

How can I expalin a complex process that becomes so simple that it can explain the universe in a nut shell so to speak.

One needs to understand condensates, transient phases from nuclear, to Neutron matter to the various quark composites and the various partons there after to the ultimate coupling of the ultimate wave/particle to form Axiion matter.

In the last ten years we have been flooded by such science information.

[pluto]

Hello one and all

To understand a Super Nova one must understand the condensate within the core causing the SN. Without this information there cnnot be any form of evidence to correlate this to any expansion of the universe or the so called Big Bang theory.

We live in the modern Era and have a better understaning of the workings of the parts within the eternal universe.

[pluto]

Hello one and all

To understand the universe one needs to understand. Reading via arXiv search.

Condensates, Gauge field on the lattice, Dirac matter, Spontaneously generated inhomogeneous phases, Lattice QCD etc etc and the formula E=MC^2.

and to know that 95%of the universe is a form of a condensate.

One of the properties of a condensate is, Electric-Magnetic dipolar field, that ejects matter from the core in the various transientphases from Neutrons(compaction 10^17) to Quarkes(compaction composites upto 10^25 plus) to Axiion matter(compaction 10^35).

This simple property prevents the formation of the classical Black Hole, creates the jet vortex that adds in the turbulence of the solar envelopes, creates the arms of spiral galaxies, the soliton vortex that we see at the centre of the MilkyWay(5,000Lyrs), M87 over 50,000 light years and within the core of super clusters of galaxies a vortex jets over 3 million light years.

The pure application of E=MC^2 is where matter enters the core and goes through a transiton into the various phases creating part of the cyclic process throughout the core of every star and AGN.

As for the Big Bang, there is no evidence to suport such a theory.

[pluto]

The Law of the lid states that you cannot think above the level that you know.

Is That right?

[pluto]

G’day

Classical Black holes do not exist and as for time, Santa is just 19 day away.

Do a bit of research on Nuclear theory, scalar theory and chiral spontaneous supersymmetry.

May be even Dirac spinnors

You can search NASA ADS or arXiv for a start.

[pluto]

Hello

Ultra dense nuclear matter can develop scalar fields, killing fields, trapping horizon that EMR cannot escape.

One of the properties of UDNM is a dipole moment that forms guage field and vortex that basic matter such as axions/anions can escape via a jet and not be influenced by the extreme gravity of the core. The wave that forms is similar to the definition of a soliton wave that remains unchanged until quantum memory allows for the tansition from axion matter to quark to Neutrons and so forth and gravity from the core starts to act on this matter forming knots. This sounds like Nuclear synthesis.

I base this information after reading, quantum memory, color superconductors, supersymmetry and scalar field theory, dipole jets and etc.

[pluto]

HELLO

The classical Black Hole definition with a singularity and an event horizon only exists on paper.

The various sciences of Nuclear theory, scalar field theory, super conductors and supersymmetry can explain the properties of ultra dense Nuclear matter that shows some of the properties of Black Holes without a singularity and an event horizon.

[pluto]

G’day

I see that I was named OLD TIMER.

Whats an OLD Croaker?

Has anybody submitted the filtering images?

[pluto]

G’day

Is anybody French.

I do not want to insult Frogs so to speak.

What ever happened to the BBT?

[pluto]

G’day

Well, well, well and a frog will follow.

So that makes me an old timer with moving parts.

[pluto]

G’day

How old do you need to me to become an OLD Timer?

[pluto]

G’day

You may find this link interesting, please excuse the non explanation by me.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.1415
Thin-shell wormholes from charged black holes in generalized dilaton-axion gravity

Authors: A. A. Usmani, F. Rahaman, Saibal Ray, Sk. A. Rakib, Z. Hasan, Peter K. F. Kuhfittig
(Submitted on 9 Jan 2010)

Abstract: This paper discusses a new type of thin-shell wormhole constructed by applying the cut-and-paste technique to two copies of a charged black hole in generalized dilaton-axion gravity, which was inspired by low-energy string theory. After analyzing various aspects of this thin-shell wormhole, we discuss its stability to linearized spherically symmetric perturbations.

You may need to go to wiki for terms.

[pluto]

G’day

Count me in

[pluto]

G’day

I agree

Cosmology is an ecosystem of forces. You cannot leave one out and hope it will work.

[pluto]

G’day

Smile

OK, now pick one topic.

Keep it to the point

[Author]

Posts