[Torulf]

According to wikipedias article on this so looks it not to be good
Chance for it to work. But it may not include the later progress by Bussard.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farnsworth-Hirsch_Fusor

Special this seems as Busard give no answer to this.
“Fundamental limitations on plasma fusion systems not in thermodynamic equilibrium”, thesis of Dr. Todd Rider
Maybe Todds thesis is a problem for focus fusion to?
And spoil the possibility for boron fusion.

[Torulf]

A very interesting lecture. There are many alternative ways for fusion power.
Some of them have to work. Its important to have research on many alternatives.
seems to this concept can not do the direct conversion of fusion to electric energy.
If so it become more expensive than focus fusion. Butt still far better than the tocamac.

here are some links. An article in Americanscientist,”Fusion from Television?”.
http://www.americanscientist.org/template/As setDetail/assetid/15723#26671
or
http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/15723

And some critique of the “inertial-electrostatic confinement fusion” systems.
May by this critique is old now.
http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product. biblio.jsp?osti_id=165283

And a group of amateur scientist making home experiments with this devise.
http://fusor.us/index.html
http://fusor.net/
http://mr-fusion.hellblazer.com/fusion_links .htm

[Torulf]

The animation it is free for use in promotion of the focus fusion research.

[Torulf]

Its may be a disadvantage to be associated to some political fraction.
But are you too much afraid for that, you can not use any argument at all.
You say the global warming argument is ok but from some right wingers this is a suspect argument.
For some extreme environmentalists the argument

[Torulf]

The timeline 50-year to working fusion is old.
During the 1970-tis time was also 50 year.
This timeline seems to be a constant.

[Author]

Posts