Well, you’re right. The supposed accumulation of radioactivity after a year of operation, is somewhat of the joined a school class of forty kids (non-ukrainian, non-japanese), as Eric explains it somewhere else in the forums.
With spacecrafts you probably only need half of the shielding to protect the crew, and let the neutrons “evaporate” up. This needs special handling on the launch site, when maintenace crew needs to service the craft.
Some more thoughts about it:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2012/01/06/aging-is-our-enemy-death-is-our-ally/
Looks like the electrodes are now coated.
No that’s not cryptic at all. You could put this on a Voyager spacecraft. π
Good!
π
Derek: Hopefully not on 1st of April. They might think it’s an April-Fool’s submission.
What about contacting the author Chris Lee about FF, with the newest publication in PoP? He seems to be a plasma physicist with access to a mainstream publication.
I’ve checked Francisl’s Link to Plansee a bit.
Plansee has Tungsten 1% Lanthanium oxide rods with a diameter of 8cm (3″) in stock (article number 268387), and pure 8cm diameter Tungsten rods (article number 148837), but those were not available yesterday.
On the other hand, they only seem to deliver rods at least 50cm long.
The corrected Plansee-Express link is here: https://www.plansee-express.com/
Plansee-Express contact for North America:
Name: Amy DβAmico
Telephone: +1 (508) 918β1263-0
Fax: +1 (508) 553β3823-531
e-Mail: expressna AT plansee.com
And the link to the USA plant of Plansee: http://www.plansee.com/en/About-us-Production-sites-USA-PLANSEE-USA-137.htm
BTW: They’ve got experience with fusion supply π http://www.plansee.com/en/Products-System-components-and-accessories-Nuclear-fusion-791.htm
As you’re asking on Twitter you’re looking for tungsten manufacturers. Most possibly you’ve already found this one, but nevertheless I’m posting it here: “China Tungsten”
For their pure tungsten portfolio look at: http://www.tungsten.com.cn/
Maybe a crucible comes close: http://www.tungsten.com.cn/tungsten-crucible.html
As they’re not offering exactly what you want, ask them directly: sales@chinatungsten.com
They’re also offering a design service (might be okay for pure tungsten too): http://www.chinatungsten.com/designing_carbides_alloys.htm
The Z-Machine actually reached ion temperatures of over 200 keV (2.3 x 10^9 K). But that’s six years ago.
What’s the record for plasma anyway?
The hottest machine I know is Sandia’s Z-Machine, reaching 1.8 milliard degrees Kelvin (that’s billion for you Americans). So about the same as Focus-Fusion-1, but by vaporizing tungsten wires.
So FuFo-1 has catched up to world record?
Other fusion efforts are way behind as far as I know.
Particle accelerators reach TeV, but they don’t count, because with them you can count every single particle (yawn!).
Cool! Sounds like my favourite sitcom. π
Especially those 72 virgins saying NO.
No, Focus-Fusion-1 has already been published in the “Journal of Fusion Energy”: Theory and Experimental Program for p-B11 Fusion with the Dense Plasma Focus
But it’s the first one that’s published peer reviewed with fusion reactions > 100keV.
By the way, it’s possible to rent those Phantom cameras:
http://www.visionresearch.com/Products/Rentals/
For TV or motion picture there are rental partners:
http://www.visionresearch.com/Solutions/Partners/Rental-Companies/
For example at $2750 per day (for a TV shot):
http://www.abelcine.com/store/Phantom-v640-High-Speed-Camera/#tabs
Maybe you’ll need more equipment, like lenses.
And you’ll need to hire an technician for these cameras:
http://resources.abelcine.com/2007/11/27/phantom-technicians/
But it’s not the High-Speed Phantom v1610, only lower speed (125,000 fps at 256 x 64 pixels) Phantom v640:
http://www.visionresearch.com/Products/High-Speed-Cameras/v640/
Other thing I found for the Phantom v1610/v1210, the spectral curve:
http://www.visionresearch.com/uploads/Docs/SpectralResponse/v1610_v1210_Sensor_Spectral_Response_mono.pdf