Top 30 Problems for Big Bang

[Jolly Roger]

How well does Dr. Lerner’s theory stand up to the problems faced by the Big Bang Theory?

http://metaresearch.org/cosmology/BB-top-30.asp

[Elling]

Read up on several pieces of the puzzle instead before attempting a synthesis.
Tom van Flandern wants both a sea of gravtions and a medium of elysons that carry lightwaves.
Even if there is much plasma stuff out there, it doesn’t necessarily mean that all things must be electrical.
NASA and Max Planck Institut claim to snapshot black holes nowadays, but Oliver Manuel thinks nuclear and neutron star matter are the same ultimate incompressible. Too many neutrons in one place create a supernova and it all starts over. http://www.omatumr.com/index.html
Life cycle of galaxies and stars seem to be a recycling of matter thru the periodic table.
Google William Mitchell for that one.

[pluto]

Hello All

Prof Oliver has hit the nail on the head with his papers.

Too many neutrons do not cause a supernova.

The evolution of a star or during its phase of life creates elements upto Fe and Ni. The elements segregate into layers as per their mass. Iron and Ni near the outer core and H and He near the surface of the solar envelope.

As the core of the sun loses it mass and density it also loses gravity control of the solar envelope allowing it to expand into a giant star. In time the inner core loses its abilty to control energy release and at the critical moment release high energy photons that hit the Fe atoms breaking them down by fission chain reactions to neutrons releasing huge amounts of energy that cause fusion chain reactions.All this occurs too quickly and the solar envelope explodes causing the supernova. At the same time the inner core is rejuvinated by Neutrons from the Iron and other elements creating a neutron core. If there is enough matter the neutrons will degenerated to quarks/preon partical composites leading to the formation of a compacted core that prevents light from escaping.

As for the papers Prof Oliver read this link
http://www.omatumr.com/papers.html

[MARK LOFTS]

Concerning the 8th problem of the Big Bang, that of dark matter to explain the motion of galaxies, the evidence certainly points to an electromagnetic explanation given that the magnetic poles of galaxies are aligned with their axes.

However the alternatives suggested in the 30 problems article include that of Milgrom’s model and the notion that there is a finite distance of action for natural forces. The first of these explains galactic structure and evolution through a minor mathematical modification of Newtonian gravity – i.e. juggling the mathematics when the evidence doesn’t fit. Unless further experimental evidence can be found for the Milgrom model it merely remains a hypothetical explanation.

The second question, that of a finite distance of action for natural forces, is mere presumption and prejudice. For example, we have no reason to think that electromagnetic wavelengths have an upper limit. While not detectable with our instruments and carrying very little energy, we cannot rule out wavelengths many lightyears long or even wavelengths as large as the metagalaxy. The prejudice of a finite action for natural forces arises for electromagnetism from the persistent false notion of a stagnant ether for the transmission of light waves. Rather, the correct answer here was suggested by Walter Ritz, who tragically died too young (30) to develop his model further. His idea is that light is not propagated but projected from a source; furthermore he was the first person to see the nonsense implicit in special relativity and rejected that theory categorically.

Yours faithfully,

Mark Lofts

[pluto]

Hello Mark

I think you are right,,,,,,,,,,,can you expand your ideas.

[Author]

Posts