The Focus Fusion Society Forums Official Announcements The Great Purge of 2013, or, Why you might have been accidentally banned.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1498
    zapkitty
    Participant

    I’ve begun processing the reg list in order to thin out the remaining
    counter-revolutionary infiltrators… er, I mean spammers.

    First I went through the old “Pending” group and deleted all regs that
    were older than 2 weeks.

    Then I went into the “Banned” group and learned that 1) It was huge
    and 2) this apparently because certain settings were sending some
    new bad regs to the banned group rather than simply denying reg.

    When I was done with the deleting the only 2 names left on the list
    were 2 known people with actual bans on them… the ban group
    thus shrinking by a few thousand regs.

    As of now I’m carefully going through the “Members” group and as a
    first step I’m running the group against the StopForumSpam database.
    Any positives will temporarily be moved to the banned list for further
    inspection and either restoration or deletion.

    So I ask that members bear with us while we sort through this and
    please contact us if there are any problems or errors.

    Sincerely,
    Comrade-citizen Zapkitty for the High Commissariat

    #12868
    zapkitty
    Participant

    Hmmm… apparently the question-and-answer captcha is leaking….
    not nearly as badly as the default picture captcha it replaces but
    leaking nonetheless…

    Hi, Ignas! The members2 group is something you’re working with?

    #12869
    Joeviocoe
    Participant

    zapkitty wrote: Hmmm… apparently the question-and-answer captcha is leaking….
    not nearly as badly as the default picture captcha it replaces but
    leaking nonetheless…

    Hi, Ignas! The members2 group is something you’re working with?

    Leaking? Not again.

    At least it isn’t arcing anymore.

    #12870
    Breakable
    Keymaster

    Hi Zap,
    I think the members2 group is for the http://denseplasmafocus.org/ domain which should probably be destroyed as no-one is taking care of it.
    Its ok if the leak is small as we have means for automatic cleanup.
    I have a pre-purge backup (somewhere in dropbox).
    Until now only one person has complained of loosing their account and he did not have it activated as it was an issue with a system back then,
    so I think the purge is successful, but we can re-invite the users if we find a bulk mailing system to use.

    Joe, please dont be cheeky, this is serious business 🙂

    #12874
    dennisp
    Participant

    Old articles seem better to me than broken links. I’d vote we keep denseplasmafocus.org up.

    #12877
    zapkitty
    Participant

    dennisp wrote: Old articles seem better to me
    than broken links. I’d vote we keep denseplasmafocus.org up.

    As I understand it the dpf org was supposed to be a meeting place for
    dpf articles and talk. Rezwan started it before the siren song of
    neutronic fusion led her astray 🙂

    Reg-wise the dpf members have their own group but not many in it…
    seems the forum mostly shared the FFS member group.

    Don’t really know what members2 was about but it’s gone now.

    And again, my apologies to anyone inconvenienced by the purge and
    please let us know if something needs fixing.

    … but the purge is far from complete, comrades! I estimate that 35-45%
    of the remaining member regs are counter-revolutionary wreckers intent
    on… er, I mean spam regs.

    #12882
    zapkitty
    Participant

    So I accidentally deleted the two members with genuine bans and we lost access to threads they’d been a part of.

    I’m a bit ticked off that deleting a banned member such as sadovnik would wreck so many threads. That is not good forum design.

    Their data can be reconstructed from forum db backups without having to roll back the entire forum but is it worth the while?

    #12883
    dennisp
    Participant

    How many threads are we talking about? What topics?

    Definitely a horrible forum design.

    #12884
    Breakable
    Keymaster

    I don’t see much point in trying to recover the threads. Let leave history to the historians.

    #12885
    zapkitty
    Participant

    dennisp wrote: How many threads are we talking about? What topics?

    Definitely a horrible forum design.

    Unknown. It only came to my attention when I realized that a lot of topics
    had gone flat-out missing in “Noise”

    Replies to the banned are AWOL… neither deleted nor accessible and
    throwing this error message:

    The following errors were encountered
    You are not authorized to perform this action

    I’m just wondering how far the damage goes because if one of the banned
    replied in a non-Noise thread then any replies chained off of that post,
    even sensible, relevant ones, would be dereferenced as well.

    #12886
    zapkitty
    Participant

    Breakable wrote: I don’t see much point in trying to recover the threads. Let leave history to the historians.

    Are we not historians, we who admin forums? 🙂

    Per stats from major search engines no small amount of desired
    information is traced back to forums.

    #12887
    Francisl
    Participant

    zapkitty wrote:

    How many threads are we talking about? What topics?

    Definitely a horrible forum design.

    Unknown. It only came to my attention when I realized that a lot of topics
    had gone flat-out missing in “Noise”

    Replies to the banned are AWOL… neither deleted nor accessible and
    throwing this error message:

    The following errors were encountered
    You are not authorized to perform this action

    I’m just wondering how far the damage goes because if one of the banned
    replied in a non-Noise thread then any replies chained off of that post,
    even sensible, relevant ones, would be dereferenced as well.

    Could you be missing necessary permissions?

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.