From research that I’ve done, using a laser to initiate the closing of the switch is possible. The question before, I think, must have been if the effort to develop a laser-based gap switch could be justified in the face of the (mostly) functional spark-gap switches.
I think that with the advent of this technology, it becomes easier to justify the research needed to develop a better switch, and to get the advantages it seems to offer: more repeatability, better simultaneity between switches, the ability to tune the switches electronically, the ability to increase the gap to lessen pre-firing, and the chance to stop using SF6 as the switch gas.
I hope that the folks running the experiment are trying to get the inside word on these thing, test results from the researchers pursuing this technology, and some units in for testing.
Pat