On a related subject, has anyone ever worried whether FFS could be read as an amusing acronym?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/22/cia-wikileaks-taskforce-wtf
Or maybe it reads as intentional – it’s FFS because the status quo (environmental devastation of ‘conventional’ energy, hardly any public resources devoted to any fusion but ITER) is exasperating.
Actually it’s too bad they didn’t look up FFS for that article.
