Reply To: NIMBY FUD

[Ivy Matt]

I haven’t really commented yet on my opinion of Keshe’s overall credibility, but there’s a reason I placed the topic in this forum. After looking through his patent applications, I’m still not clear on how a physical embodiment of his invention, assuming one were to exist, would perform useful work. On his website Keshe touts an evaluation of his concept by a professor of mechanical engineering, who gives a rather confusing opinion. He says that the concepts behind energy production are feasible, but at the same time he strongly recommends that an expert in the field of nuclear energy production give a second opinion on the practical feasibility of the project, as his research does not concern nuclear energy production. That recommendation was made in 2005. I see no such second opinion on Keshe’s website, suggesting he either never sought it, or received it, but didn’t like the answer.