The Focus Fusion Society › Forums › Lawrenceville Plasma Physics Experiment (LPPX) › Microsupercapacitors
Found an article on a new class of capacitors.
Ultrahigh-power micrometre-sized supercapacitors based on onion-like carbon
Electrochemical capacitors, also called supercapacitors, store energy in two closely spaced layers with opposing charges, and are used to power hybrid electric vehicles, portable electronic equipment and other devices. By offering fast charging and discharging rates, and the ability to sustain millions of cycles electrochemical capacitors bridge the gap between batteries, which offer high energy densities but are slow, and conventional electrolytic capacitors, which are fast but have low energy densities. Here, we demonstrate microsupercapacitors with powers per volume that are comparable to electrolytic capacitors, capacitances that are four orders of magnitude higher, and energies per volume that are an order of magnitude higher. We also measured discharge rates of up to 200 V sā1, which is three orders of magnitude higher than conventional supercapacitors. The microsupercapacitors are produced by the electrophoretic deposition of a several-micrometre-thick layer of nanostructured carbon onions with diameters of 6ā7 nm. Integration of these nanoparticles in a microdevice with a high surface-to-volume ratio, without the use of organic binders and polymer separators, improves performance because of the ease with which ions can access the active material. Increasing the energy density and discharge rates of supercapacitors will enable them to compete with batteries and conventional electrolytic capacitors in a number of applications.
via Ars Technica
That’s fascinating! This will go a long way toward miniaturization of a dpf. And it also shows that research into renewable energy and electric vehicles has synergy with fusion research.
The next generation of solid state ultra capacitors seems just around the corner. For years now the rumors have been seeping into the blogs (http://theeestory.com/). The patent (applications), the apparent involvement of Lockheed Martin and ARPA… Now imagine if FFeasibility is demonstrated the next year, and at the same time the world would see the first ultracapacitor with power densities rivaling the best of today’s batteries; that would be a very timely arrival indeed…
Correct me if I’m wrong, but the critical part of the capacitor for DPF fusion is the switches, and not the capacitors per se. Smaller capacitors might be a bit cheaper, but they wouldn’t help with the most important part.
Tulse wrote: Correct me if I’m wrong, but the critical part of the capacitor for DPF fusion is the switches, and not the capacitors per se. Smaller capacitors might be a bit cheaper, but they wouldn’t help with the most important part.
I believe they’re thinking of the prospects for making DPFs more compact… notice the mass, volume and requisite structural supports of the FFX caps…
… a ~2 meter sphere could fit in a lot of places a 2 meter x 3 meter cylinder would not fit…
If brought into the FFX voltage and or current ranges, it could greatly reduce the number of switches needed. The millions of cycles is sounding a lot better than what’s available today, but billions, or even trillions of cycles- or a cap bank that’s cheap enough to “throw away” (recycle into less-demanding uses) at least once a year is going to make DPF-based fusion generators a LOT easier to sell, imo.
Whilst the current experimental setup definitely needs switches, might it be possible for the final production version to run without switches i.e. continuously and contiguously cycling, so that as one plasmoid detaches, a new discharge starts the axial phase of the following plasmoid?? That would need more parallel capacitors so that the first cycle doesn’t deplete the capacitors, and would result in a faster cycling rate than presently envisaged??
Allan Brewer wrote: Whilst the current experimental setup definitely needs switches, might it be possible for the final production version to run without switches i.e. continuously and contiguously cycling, so that as one plasmoid detaches, a new discharge starts the axial phase of the following plasmoid?? That would need more parallel capacitors so that the first cycle doesn’t deplete the capacitors, and would result in a faster cycling rate than presently envisaged??
We’ll probably always need caps and switches to fire the first shot in a resonant circuit that could eliminate the question of the cap bank’s rated life at any given voltage. How to do that with only one or a handful of FF cores and cap banks will have a lot to do with who leads the initial manufacturing market due to elegant system design producing the reliability and price points required at any point in the adoption timeframe.
Aeronaut wrote:
We’ll probably always need caps and switches to fire the first shot in a resonant circuit that could eliminate the question of the cap bank’s rated life at any given voltage. How to do that with only one or a handful of FF cores and cap banks will have a lot to do with who leads the initial manufacturing market due to elegant system design producing the reliability and price points required at any point in the adoption timeframe.
Even without a resonant circuit, if there was a sufficiently high capacitance (say to cover 3 or 4 shots), then a basic switch could be used to start up a single machine, the current would probably ramp up too slowly for plasmoid formation on the first couple of shots, but once the current is up then the machine could perhaps keep cycling contiguously without any hi-tec switches, so that as one plasmoid detaches, a new discharge starts the axial phase for the following plasmoid??
Allan Brewer wrote: Whilst the current experimental setup definitely needs switches, might it be possible for the final production version to run without switches i.e. continuously and contiguously cycling, so that as one plasmoid detaches, a new discharge starts the axial phase of the following plasmoid??
What a cool visual.
Title: A New Synthetic Test Plant at KEMA High Power Laboratory
Author: Damastra, GC
Source: In: Symposium on High Voltage Switching Equipment (1979 : Sydney, N.S.W.). Symposium on High Voltage Switching Equipment 1979: Preprints of Papers. Barton, ACT: Institution of Engineers, Australia, 1979: 3-7
A 100-/uF,50-kV capacitor bank is used as a current source in combination with a series coil of. 1 mH,giving a 500-Hz ringing discharge […]
— http://search.informit.com.au/fullText;dn=712896887551897;res=IELENG
vansig wrote: Title: A New Synthetic Test Plant at KEMA High Power Laboratory
Author: Damastra, GC
Source: In: Symposium on High Voltage Switching Equipment (1979 : Sydney, N.S.W.). Symposium on High Voltage Switching Equipment 1979: Preprints of Papers. Barton, ACT: Institution of Engineers, Australia, 1979: 3-7A 100-/uF,50-kV capacitor bank is used as a current source in combination with a series coil of. 1 mH,giving a 500-Hz ringing discharge […]
— http://search.informit.com.au/fullText;dn=712896887551897;res=IELENG
Good lead, bad link. This may work: http://search.informit.com.au/search;action=doSearch
=====================
Edit: No such luck. On both of these links you have to click to the search page and enter High Voltage Switching NOT and leave the second search term blank to find 31 docs pertaining to this piece.
*sigh*. if only they could be fined for not using RESTful architecture, we might at least get them to spit out an abstract, reliably.
I was corresponding with some electronics nerds about FF1’s architecture, and one suggested to try losing the capacitor bank altogether, and turn the system into a resonant circuit. Maybe keep the capacitor bank in, to charge the first shot, but switch it out and power the next shot directly from the collecting coils