Breakable wrote: I don’t think informal evidence can be convincing and it would take time away from actual progress. What you probably would want is peer reviewed papers in prestigious journal, with other experiments/papers that are confirming the results.

“Convincing” isn’t the point. Progress updates don’t have to be presented with scientific rigor. LPP would naturally need to be cautious about claims and predictions, but those can safely be left to the comments and forums. 😉 :cheese: That would be us. :coolsmile: