Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 123 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fusion Oil #2948
    Duke Leto
    Participant

    Well…

    Why not just stick a FF reactor on the back of a half track with a few charge cable attached and have it follow the earth movers?

    in reply to: Fusion Oil #2590
    Duke Leto
    Participant

    Nice hammer!

    in reply to: Questions regarding DPF. #2454
    Duke Leto
    Participant

    That was sarcasm, my dear Eric.

    I am but incompetent with General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, when the Physics is Newtonian, I know a hawk from a henshaw.

    😉

    in reply to: What are you doing to promote Focus Fusion… #2453
    Duke Leto
    Participant

    I’m fomenting an insane scheme to rapidly acquire all the investment capital myself and buy LPP, and then whip poor old Eric like Groves did to Oppenheimer. Only without the subsequent blacklisting.

    in reply to: Fusion Oil #2451
    Duke Leto
    Participant

    Here’s a vicious and cynical line of thinking:

    1) Oil wells become depleted because the energy required to get the oil out of the ground costs more then the energy yielded by the oil as fuel.
    2) All oil wells are not tapped completely dry, there is almost always some deposit that can’t be sucked up economically.
    3) A focus fusion reactor onsite vastly changes the cost of energy needed to extract the oil from the depleted wells.
    4) There are tons and tons of depleted wells across the US.
    5) If focus fusion works, why not use it to up US oil productivity to prevent a peak oil economic crash while EESTOR or some other electric car tech is implemented?

    in reply to: Questions regarding DPF. #2450
    Duke Leto
    Participant

    Stupid, weak, puny gamma.

    It’s amazing you can even obliterate cities with that pissant radiation.

    in reply to: General thought on old coal mines. #2300
    Duke Leto
    Participant

    OK, I’ve looked things over, and I think that the bleaker projection on the idea may be correct.

    First, most modern subterranean mining uses a technique called the “longwall”, where a large extraction mechanism processes a coal seam in its entirety while supports are held over it. As the material is extracted, the supports are advanced and the material is allowed to fill the now vacant space.

    Ergo, no tunnels.

    So it would only be OLD mines that would be useful, and therefore the least stable.. And then again there would be the startup expense of sealing, which would need to be a double sealant using one layer a to a cover the rock, some kind of intermediary liquid with sensors to find disturbances in said liquid from ruptures, and an outer layer. And then in aquaculture added supports would be needed to take care of the dangers of subsidance caused by the weight of the water.

    All very expensive…

    in reply to: General thought on old coal mines. #2290
    Duke Leto
    Participant

    The basic concern was making sure that the coal mining communities don’t have to go through a nasty transition into ghost towns.

    in reply to: Fusion Oil #2246
    Duke Leto
    Participant

    What, and Porn is now an accurate representation of sex?

    Seriously though I’m quite alive to the faults in the entire concept, but what really irritates me is the incredible sloppiness of the editing interfaceand the storage and searching systems.

    in reply to: Fusion Oil #2244
    Duke Leto
    Participant

    Just have to get our intellectual porn from Wikipedia then.

    in reply to: Fusion Oil #2238
    Duke Leto
    Participant

    But I like intellectual masturbation!

    It can be so hard to get some decent intellectual intercourse going these days.

    in reply to: Fusion Oil #2234
    Duke Leto
    Participant

    It’s all intellectual masturbation until there’s a prototype.

    in reply to: X-Rays from Focus Fusion #2230
    Duke Leto
    Participant

    Complete nitpick, but these puppies are Gamma Rays and not X-Rays according to the strict definition. I know the wavelength rages overlap, but X-Rays are from chemical radioactive decay and Gammas for full on fusion and fission, right?

    in reply to: X-Rays from Focus Fusion #2227
    Duke Leto
    Participant

    Worrisomely enough, if you Google “x-ray photovoltaics”, you get an article from 1979 about some Lithium compound at the top, and then this thread on page 3.

    in reply to: X-Rays from Focus Fusion #2225
    Duke Leto
    Participant

    Has there ever been any reason to make one transmute?

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 123 total)