Aeronaut wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focus_fusion
[…]
Also it would be a good idea to link to some press releases and/or papers that cite “Focus Fusion” name. Any good ones?
[…]
This may be enough to take it beyond the stub phase and I believe is well-suited to Wiki’s spirit- not necessarily the political bias in their editing wars.
Complaints i see on the article’s talk page are about the specific wording of the term, its distinctiveness, and about whether it’s a promotional gimmick. So the fastest way to dispel those is to find and post more links to published papers that are independent from those authored by Eric, Lawrenceville plasma physics, or the focusfusion.org website.
