Reply To: What are you doing to promote Focus Fusion…

[Rezwan]

Tulse wrote:
Once the device is demonstrably showing over-unity, Dr. Lerner, the issue won’t be one of science, but technology, and you won’t have to convince the physics establishment, but possible licensees of your design. I think that will be a much easier process…

What will the process be? That is the question. Phase I of LPPX is designed to show feasibility. Assuming they show that, it will be – not so much disputed – but there will be a lag time for peer review and validation overlapping with phase II, and there are some powerful interests who might like to see the venture fail. It’s not that they can do much – but there’s some potential turbulence the shape of which we can’t know at this time. In the face of uncertainty, it’s best to be prepared for any eventuality.

For FFS, being prepared means having a strong network of diverse supporters from many walks of society in place and a strong web platform to coordinate activities. It means having a pro-fusion culture globally, paying attention.

For LPP, being prepared means having a strong and committed network of investors, advisors, and resources to weather any storm.

What will or won’t happen is speculation. What we can do to be prepared for anything is proactivity.