Duke Leto wrote: I got the conclusion part of Dyson’s review. The principle being that one should gamble on the emergence of a technology suc h as FF.
With all due respect, that’s the equivalent of buying a lottery ticket on the principle that it is a sound investment. Making long term plans on the assumption of constantly improving technology is lunacy.
Read more. Even doing nothing is better than implementing Gore’s strategies. Dyson reports Nordhaus’ conclusion: use carbon taxes as the most benign current strategy, but aggressively pursue new energy sources (like FF).
I find nothing to disagree with, there. Do you?
