msmith wrote:
The criticisms of Svensmark’s CRF/Cloud formation theory have been rebutted.
The wikipedia article you posted has links to some but not all of these replies.
Some replies may be found here: http://www.sciencebits.com/SloanAndWolfendale
The “CLOUD” experiment at Cern is currently underway to further test his theory and hopefully provide a detailed explanation of this cloud formation mechanism.
Time will tell.
Well good luck to him developing his theory. It is appropriate that scientific measurements are being used to look for evidence.
I prefer better established explanation of co2, but if evidence would suggest otherwise I could even believe in cosmic rays, gravitational waves, sunspots or whatever…
I am not a physicist to evaluate whatever evidence can be available, so probably would have trust what most of scientific community thinks about it.
One thing that does not bare well with me is global conspiracy. Of course there is a lot underwater currents, but only in North Korea a contrarian position is always right.