Phil’s Dad wrote: Until he proves otherwise…
Heh!
If he does prove otherwise, that statement’ll get you in hot water again:
dash wrote: I see. Now as a bit of useful feedback, in the future you might want to state exactly what you mean, because the “Until then…” was very ambiguous, and what first came to mind was nothing whatsoever like what you intended to convey.
Such exactitude. From a guy who claims others don’t acknowledge the limits of knowledge. What about the limits of language? Language is like plasma. You can’t straightjacket it into something exact. It defies control. It may give the illusion of precision but it’s really fundamentally ambiguous stuff.
You have to kind of dance with it. Get into a groove.
Your “Until…” statements have seemed pretty straightforward to me. But what do I know?