Reply To: T-shirt designers unite and take over

[Breakable]

Brian H wrote:
Which is the problem; there are uber-editors who can remove or block what they dislike, tho’. There are lots of politically sensitive sites where one viewpoint is instantly attacked and removed by other / majority consensus “editing”, and sometimes it’s subtle alterations of material to make it look goofy. Wiki is a battleground.

While I agree with you that wiki is a battleground, I think the battles should be fought and won.There are a lot of editors that support only mainstream science, anyone can add content and fight for its preservation, if there is enough motivation for that.
An annotation that a specific article does not match scientific consensus might be offensive, if its true it should be carried proudly, until times change.
I would really love to see an article about QGrav in wikipedia. I would write one myself, but I am not a physicist, and even my understanding of fundamentals is mostly sketchy. This is why I usually rely on others Criticism, and I expect any Criticism to be correctly addressed.