Reply To: Some about a fusion dispute in Sweden.

[Aeronaut]

jamesr wrote:

I doubt it would be beneficial, James, since the design is entirely about moving magnetic fields. ‘Sides, you know what more moving parts do to MTBF and profitability projections….

There will be moving parts in the system; coolant pumps, vacuum pumps etc. (multiples of each for redundancy). I was just thinking whether modulating the pressure in the chamber over the course of the cycle would reduce the wear and load on the inner surface and components inside exposed to the few thousand degree plasma that will exist between cycles. Do the benefits outweigh the disadvantages of mechanical parts and extra complexity?

There is a comprimise between cooling the waste heat out of the plasma in the bulk of the chamber between pulses, and letting it cool too far so the it starts recombining and leaving deposits.

Yes, the system will probably always have moving parts. I’d recommend drawing up a timing chart of the current–> fields–>plasmoid–> beam processes before even trying to fit moving parts into a future design’s chamber dynamics. I suspect you’re going to encounter more energy required to move your parts far enough, fast enough, than first appears (ask me about my gravity engine, lol).