Reply To: Site availability is poor

[Steven Sesselmann]

ikanreed wrote:
1. Give an example where the measurements are more accurate to your theory versus the standard model(Null hypothesis validation)
or
2. Give where the calculations get the same results for existing measurements, but simplify the formulas(Occam’s razor validation)

That’s it. Those are the only two ways you can have a decent improvement on existing science.

You are quite right, and what I have proposed so far is nothing more than a hypothesis, and now it is a matter as quoted above, to show mathematically that it is either more accurate or at least simpler than existing theory,

…and if it turns out to be rubbish, then it’s just another piece of paper for the basket, I have had plenty of those.

I believe it is better to try many ideas than to sit around waiting for a perfect one 🙂

Steven