Using DT is not relevent. We are not using tritium, and although we produce it, it is in very small amounts. The main point is that Dr. Lee’s model predictions dropped by a factor of 100 between the early and late versions. That does not sound right, and I have contacted him about it. The new version is not at all close to our observations, while the old one is. A decimal point error is possible, and very common.
As to the equation, there is a lot on the Dr. Lee’s site, so I suggest you post a link to the actual paper and what number equation you are questioning, so we can find it.
