The Focus Fusion Society › Forums › Focus Fusion Cafe › Least neutronic fusion chemistry so far? › Reply To: Repowering the electric utility industry
benf wrote:
So Lerner,
The above list of reactions creating neutrons and ionizing radiation is exhaustive?
An the second one (11B + p → 11C + n − 2.8 MeV) is the only one you think can’t be avoided?
I’m focusing on the need for shielding, not byproducts that affect maintenance. To me this is a bigger issue affecting my investment in DPF research.
The subject of radiation has been debated many times in the Forum, which you can easily do a search for. The upshot is that with pb11 the DPF is going to be the cleanest burning fusion generator out there and will be producing prodigious amounts of power. All with a very compact footprint. What more do you need? What more do you think is really possible with any other design?
I think your investment dollars would be well rewarded in DPF research.
I think what opensource may be getting at is this:
Are there any downplayed drawbacks to the DPF shielding requirements that might make DPF a much less attractive solution in the future?
Such as how Nuclear Fission Power was once regarded as silver bullet to energy needs. It produced LOTS of power in a very small reactor (compared to other power plants at the time). And the fuel was VERY abundant too. But dealing with radiation (both in the reactor and the fuel itself) proved to be more problematic than many early claims indicated. Shielding, safety systems, fuel handling, separation of water cycles, waste handling…. were all problems created due to radioactivity. And those problems made Fission power plants MUCH larger and MUCH more expensive. So now, Nuclear power makes up only 20% of the electric power in the U.S.
It is a very pertinent question to ask about the exact requirements for shielding. We have already eliminated most concerns; the fuel (decaborane is toxic but non-radioactive), no radioactive water cycles, and waste is inert helium. The only concerns left are the safety systems of High electrical power (easy) and shielding from possible radiation from side reactions.