Breakable wrote:
Henning;
The “argument from Authority” you quote is readily and easily counterbalanced by a much larger pool of equally or better-qualified scientists who reject most of the core arguments, partly because the modelling is so crude compared to the minimum required to deal with multivariate non-linear systems like climate. …
Such pool does not exist or at least they are not climatologists.
Maybe they are physicists or literature professors?
I would rather see you go the other route, that “Consensus does not actually mean anything”.
Neither the “Consensus” nor “climatology” exist. There is no such degree; those claiming/inventing the title are dabbling in physics, mathematics, oceanography, hydrology, computer modelling, forecasting, and meteorology without qualifications in any of them. Those who do have such qualifications are contemptuous of their amateurish abuse of those specialties.