Reply To: Proliferation?

[Tasmodevil44]

I have always liked to rock the boat and make waves against established dogma when thinking outside the usual paradign of scientific thought. I have oftentimes been ridiculed as being some kind of ignorant and naive crackpot for it. Although I never recieve recognition for anything, I’m occasionally correct about these so – salled ” crackpot ” notions.

And I can think of no better example than my own questioning of the big bang. It never did ever sit well with me. It’s almost like getting roasted at the stake by mainstream science’s 14 th century witchcraft inquisitors for having the courage to question such a darling sacred cosmological cow.

One of the phony arguements for the longest running time has been the CBR (cosmic background radiation) that was discovered by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, of the Bell Telephone Laboratories, using their sensitive microwave horn antenna. I have always believed that a more plausible explanation is simply all the general background static from the entire universe…… light from stars, galaxies, planets, and etc. …… all being red – shifted down to the radio portion of the spectrum by some particular means.

I have always been a big fan of the never ending, ever – lasting, steady – state universe myself. Although many in mainstream science today consider this to be an outmoded, quaint theory that’s lost it’s sexiness appeal.