Reply To: Pitching to Arnold

[Brian H]

Aeronaut wrote: That binary progression was the missing link, Brian. Each GW produces enough annual profit to install 2GW the next year. :coolsmile:

Any ideas how to gracefully bury the roadkill? Or would this kind of “unfair advantage” make the point moot? Since nothing succeeds like success, I imagine the originator has at most a two year head start before any competition can begin appearing online.

It’s not exactly profit, just “saving”, comparing the two. If you billed for the FF output at current rates, that would be cash in hand. Billed at FF rates, it then represents money left in the hands of users/consumers. Which is arguably the best place for it!

Maybe the generating plants could be gutted and re-stocked with stacked FF units? Make use of the grid connections, etc.