Reply To: minimal size device for focus fusion to work?

[vansig]

delt0r wrote: That is a awful analogy and totally wrong.

But being wrong is good? 😛
My point was that we cant compare apples to oranges. Compton scattering and gamma emission might some day be shown to belong to a different regime. But, w.r.t their results, i should admit to you that i am *not* on their side, about this.

Never mind they also magically produce copper in natural isotope ratios […]

actually, this “production” of copper in natural isotope ratios is not really surprising, and yes it should make us all suspicious.

in a previous post i pointed out that trace elements found on their anode after their experiments looked to me to be just like what you’d find if, instead of using a solid nickel anode, you had used a nickel-plated aluminum anode that had suffered pitting during the experimental process.. since finishers will ordinarily apply an under-layer of copper to help the nickel adhere.

finding copper in natural isotopic ratios would seem to support my interpretation.