Reply To: Iconography

[Aeronaut]

Thanx for the background, Brian. The tone and case-building is going to help me a lot. Two things I do consciously avoid are sounding like a zealot and/or utopian.

Yes, some will believe, but most won’t. My target audience is people who control vast influence and need this technology bad. I did some YouTube experiments last year. One was titled “This Sale Took Five Words”. See the logic? I don’t have to waste anybody’s time writing overly persuasive copy. I’m making my case to people who bought into the concept of a five word close. And 70% of the decision to buy, or at least read more, is made in the headline.

How do you target magnetic field, confinement density and energy efficiency? Mainly by experimenting with anode and cathode lengths and radii. I’m sure you know the difference between split-testing and multi-variant testing. Even 4 variable MVT takes a lot longer to fully optimize a sales letter, and even then you’ll be using it as the control to test new headlines, calls to action, etc.

The FF reactor is already being used as an X-ray generator, and seems to be an effective source of lower level heat. Therefore we do not need perfection, which is a purely mathematical concept, in order to benefit real people with real problems.