In so much as wikipedia wants to rely on verifiable secondary-sourced material, the absence of controversy from the article suggests that the ongoing mud-slinging here may be ordinary posturing among arrogant specialists. Who really has a better grasp of the concept and where it’s applicable? I certainly don’t.
But they are using language that seethes with contempt. I’ll have to study the concept some more, myself, but so far i’m reading that the concept of reconnection is being misused by one of these two experts..
kind of like comparing a broken circuit
to two or more circuits becoming one.
