KeithPickering wrote: No dark matter is also consistent with BB, a theory which preceded DM and is not dependent upon it.
My reading and re-reading of BBNH tells me BB proponents are desparate to find DM in order to save the BB theory. The proportion of gravity to visible matter does not allow for a BB expansion. For BB to work, they must assume that 90% or better of all matter must be the mysterious and hypotherical DM. Am I in error here?
