Reply To: Earthquake v. Powerplants

[benf]

Who to believe? Radioactive materials are now showing up in the food supply in Japan. Should you still eat it? What to do with grazing farm animals in the vicinity that you can’t bring to market? Should pregnant women be concerned? What about infants and small children? Can you believe in the [email=http://www.pacificecologist.org/archive/12/behind-the-cover-up.pdf]UNSCEAR reports[/email]? How much exposure is a [email=http://books.google.com/books?id=Uqj4OzBKlHwC&pg=PA128&lpg=PA128&dq=critic+unscear&source=bl&ots=I_PRw5Y-uN&sig=XPLi6UHFdsisDmlgC_Xy7BxdMAE&hl=en&ei=nCGFTe6EB5P6sAOwrunyAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBMQ6AEwADgK#v=onepage&q&f;=false]problem[/email]?
And all of this shouldn’t be newsworthy? Does it have to be dead bodies to count? Sorry to say it, the news for fission nuclear has been bad.

Radiation is successfully used in medicine to treat disease and for diagnostic purposes, but in very controlled environments. Fukushima has been out of control.

Correct me if I’m wrong with this information: With Focus Fusion (using hydrogen and pB11), you won’t be using radioactive materials that can spread into the environment. When it is running neutrons aren’t produced that would make materials radioactive. With Focus Fusion, you wouldn’t have a meltdown, it would simply stop working.