Transmute wrote:
[
a) Heard about Climategate yet?
yes, yet the scientific evidence for anthropogenic climate change is not limited to IPCC, for example where in this argument is the IPCC data cited? Your argument is equivalent to saying the sky is not blue because the filters on a specific camera are suspect.
b) FF will delay peak oil indefinitely, as its use will plummet. So it’s on the way to being an irrelevancy.
Assuming FF is achieved and soon.
That site is another shill site for the money-chasers (and make no mistake, billions have been and are being spent to try and push the panic button and keep the governments funding everything in sight).
Try this: http://arxiv.org/pdf/0707.1161v4
The second assertion on that page (CO2 traps heat) is false in any measurable sense, especially in atmospheres. Even the assertion that CO2 is rising since pre-industrial days is faked: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/18343 .
The scatterplot points for the 19th Century were obtained using EXACTLY the same procedures now used by the best laboratories, minus a few automation tricks.
Bogus. Every jot and tittle of it.