Reply To: Direction of Emission of the three He ions after B-H fusion reaction.

[Johan Clemmesen]

I don’t think that argumentation about fusion experiment should be pre formulated in a generic flow chart. It is complicated and comprehensive to think about all intricacies on human argumentation that can be emotional and not based on science facts or economics.

There are pro’s and con’s on focused fusion as there is about everything else.

I suggest that a comparative analysis list is drawn up comparing FF, fossil fuels, renewables and nuclear fission.

That way it is easy to understand limitations and possibilities. I strongly suggest that the situation with cheap FF power is examined with the positive consequences for renewables since they are very power consuming in the first place. There are however also the counter argument that especially farmed fuels are extremely resource demanding with water and time.

the comparative points could be:

1. area requirement and size, maybe even mass/ watt ratio for a plant can be added
2. emmisions in use
3. waste
4. radiation and time to safe radiation level
5. Fuel cost
6. Price pr. KwH reflecting resource and human time usage(labour) and thereby environmental friendliness!!!
7. future development possibilityes. size, cleanlyness

Just a suggestion

BR J

BR J