benf wrote: Proposition 16, the New Two-Thirds Requirement for Local Public Electricity Providers Act is on the June 8, 2010 ballot in California as an initiated constitutional amendment.
Wouldn’t this be a problem for FF if it wins in California?
http://www.ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/California_Proposition_16_(June_2010)
Sorry, Benf, that’s a dead link. In general, the higher the official pressure for clean energy at an affordable price, the better we’ll look when we emerge with the solutions to many problems such as bio fuels, the tooling chain’s ability to lower the cost of solar cells, and desalination, to name just a few.
If that really is designed to limit taxpayers’ right to vote, that’s supposed to be unconstitutional. If that’s the case, is it being challenged as such already?
