Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #858
    Rezwan
    Participant

    This just in: http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100707/full/news.2010.337.html

    The proton seems to be 0.00000000000003 millimetres smaller than researchers previously thought, according to work published in today’s issue of Nature.

    The difference is so infinitesimal that it might defy belief that anyone, even physicists, would care. But the new measurements could mean that there is a gap in existing theories of quantum mechanics. “It’s a very serious discrepancy,” says Ingo Sick, a physicist at the University of Basel in Switzerland, who has tried to reconcile the finding with four decades of previous measurements. “There is really something seriously wrong someplace.”

    What are the implications?

    But, Carlson says, “the first thing is to go through the existing calculations with a fine-toothed comb”. It could be that an error was made, or that approximations made in existing quantum calculation simply aren’t good enough. “Right now, I’d put my money on some other correction,” he says. “It’s also where my research time will be going over the next month.”

    #7512
    vansig
    Participant

    if these are not erroneous, then the most direct implication is, that theory needs a bit of tweaking to cover the discrepancy.

    new particles? perhaps.

    a deeper understanding? probably.

    a complete turn-over of subatomic models?
    –now wouldn’t that be exciting?

    #7529
    H.Nightroad
    Participant

    … the quantum level of things is near on impossible to quantify (theres a pun there somewhere) really all we have is just a heap of theories that state how it appears to us… its just too small to understand fully, the theories will always have to be changed when new experiments are proven to show different/more accurate results than the last batch, damn quantum/neiclear physics, its making me all emo

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.