technical discussions regarding the application of focus fusion are likely to pick up and branch out as the technology approaches unity, so yes it would make sense to promote these threads

The whole DPF hypothesis is probably a radical outlier according to most of the conventional fusion crowd. I’m not fully competent to judge the assessments I’ve read, but they seem to go off into quickly dismissing it as a minor phenomenon, doomed to lose energy faster than it can be utilized. Thus, the “break-even” point for FF, if achieved, will cause a major rethink, I think!

E.g.: a recent remark posted somewhere I was outlining FF was along the lines of listing all the high multiples of temperature etc. that pB11 fusion had to achieve, and the comment that it was dreaming to try and master it before “garden variety” conventional fusion.

Anyhow, that’s the tone I get, and I hope and expect those expressing it are shortly gob-struck by LPP’s success.

Tulse wrote:

E.g.: a recent remark posted somewhere I was outlining FF was along the lines of listing all the high multiples of temperature etc. that pB11 fusion had to achieve, and the comment that it was dreaming to try and master it before “garden variety” conventional fusion.

One response to that: a dream that costs four to six orders of magnitude less to research than has been spent on “garden variety” fusion is a good gamble.
Damn $traight! My WAG was that their budget for coffee would suffice. 😉