1)Is probably a good addition as “CHEAP” can be relative. What is cheap in USA can be expensive in Uganda.

2)Would be nice to include as many options as possible.
I am not sure about other members but I don’t mind neutronic nor even fission-fusion hybrids as long as the end goal is achieved. Of course I also support other endeavors like thorium reactors or renewable energy, but those have their own supporter base, where fusion seems to be quite divided by different concepts. So I would probably suggest to change the statement
“We will pursue this purpose by developing the Plasma Focus device for hydrogen-boron nuclear fusion.”
to
“We will pursue this purpose by supporting any nuclear fusion development, by applying a priority to the cheapest, cleanest and most rapid approach”.
This could probably win more people over from other camps as well as bring independent (amateurs) to brag about their developments here.