Brian H wrote:

Here’s some info about how unclean the AGW data is: http://69.84.25.250/blogger/post/ClimateGate-Data-Series-Part-I-A-break-down-of-large-data-file-for-manipulating-global-temperature-trends-from-2006-2009.aspx

I am not a statistics expert, but this article is flawed. Type I error does not make hypothesis invalid:

The hypothesis can be inappropriately rejected, this is called type I error, or one can inappropriately fail to reject the hypothesis, this is called type II error