Here’s a few quick comments on the first few sections, I’ll have a look through the rest later.

Aneutronic Advantages – Don’t have cold fusion statement first. I think you get a kind of guilt by association, we do not want FF to be associated in peoples minds with this so even a statement saying it is NOT this creates an association. Don’t be so black&white;with the No neutrons – we need to be honest about the small percentage of low energy neutrons.

A comparison of typical Conventional and aneutronic fusion fuels – mention other aneutronic reactions and that pB11 is just the most favourable of these.

Dense Plasma Focus (DPF) Advantage – Mention why pB11 will not work in conventional tokamak design (they can never get hot enough). Fusion with higher charged ions such as Boron will only work in a device that can create the huge magnetic fields needed to suppress the cooling by radiation mechanism. Also mention efficiency due to direct conversion to electricity rather than the thermal cycle.

I think there should be some mention of other plasma focus research around the world. Although LLP may be the only company working on it as a power source there are many groups using and researching plasma focus devices for other uses. They are not something new – we can bring together and discuss relevant advances from other groups.