You big, Rematog. Even lil brother is 220 MW. If they don’t really want to save ~200M$/yr, while reducing their exposure to the EPA, Rick Wagner may still be looking for work…

Seriously, though, even a 300′ furnace/boiler has to be zoned so it can be periodically inspected without shutting the whole site down. Therefore, a business case could be built around replacing small pieces in say, a five to ten year plan as everybody gets comfortable with the idea.

No stranded assets, improved response to peak loads, steadily reduced EPA exposure, and (hopefully) stable or declining net fuel costs.