Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 108 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Physics Nobel to Big Bangers #2428
    pluto
    Participant

    Hello Mark

    You said

    I imagine you are well aware that BBNH is essentially one protracted argument against lowering the star/dust ratio

    in reply to: Physics Nobel to Big Bangers #2427
    pluto
    Participant

    Hello AaronB

    This link is for you

    http://woodall.ncsa.uiuc.edu/dbock/Vis/NeutronStar/Summary.html

    Smile and others.

    in reply to: Physics Nobel to Big Bangers #2425
    pluto
    Participant

    Hello Mark

    I have read your posts.

    Have you considered, what actaully happens to EMR when it comes and goes from an ultra dense matter such as a Neutron star.

    As for the source of the plasma.

    Have you look at the formation of neutron cores.

    Do you understand where the neutrons come from? Do you understand what triggers the process?

    in reply to: Physics Nobel to Big Bangers #2419
    pluto
    Participant

    Hello Mark

    I have been in ozzzzzzzzzzzz for 51 years from an Island called Cyprus the centre of the universe.

    Galactic recession,,,,,,,,,,,,I need info so that I can prove it, who knows I could be wrong.

    Ultra dense plasma matter is my pet subject.

    I have this intereting link from Prof Olover Manuel

    http://www.omatumr.com/index.html

    Cutting edge info.

    also read this on Neutron Stars
    http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/neustars00/

    http://books.google.com/books?id=mVdoYyT7LqIC&dq=neutron+stars&printsec=frontcover&source=web&ots=MkTM_KmaXT&sig=nGwL1IEnCrtsQGbnmKneBOAMY0E#PPA3,M1

    http://snns.in2p3.fr/nstar/0609meeting.html

    http://www.milkyweb.de/astrolinks/neutronenstern.htm
    http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/neustars00/

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19461296/
    http://focus.aps.org/story/v4/st22

    http://www.astroscu.unam.mx/neutrones/home.html

    Smile,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,have fun with it

    Maybe you know all the above and if so,,,,,,,,,,,,thats great

    in reply to: A Big Prick in the Balloon of the Big Bang #2414
    pluto
    Participant

    Hello All

    Why do people waste their time even discussing the Big Bang Theory?. It has become the crank pot theory in the last 8 decades.

    in reply to: Physics Nobel to Big Bangers #2413
    pluto
    Participant

    Hello Mark

    Where does plasma come from?

    Mate, in its true definition all is plasma.

    Think about it.

    Now the compacted cores that are found in star bodies is something special. Most of the Milky way mass is found in compacted cores.

    There are varies ways to create this compacted matter.

    By some form of gravity sinks throughout the galaxy being used to make a zone stable enough to hold compacted matter such as Neutrons. Starformation process.

    Theoretical opinion.
    The other is by black holes ejecting compacted matter, this type of matter is very special, a soccer ball size has the same mass as our sun. Elliptical galaxies are formed and structures by these active neucleons ejecting these gravity sinks. Imagine a few would make a cluster of stars.
    Now imagine what this jet can form, like a wild hose ejecting matter thousands of light years into space. This is against main stream thought. So I’m uptream. Smile

    in reply to: Physics Nobel to Big Bangers #2411
    pluto
    Participant

    Hello Mark

    May I ask you to do more reading on the evolution of galaxies. I will do the same.

    I came across this link

    http://academia.wikia.com/wiki/Time_acceleration_hypothesis

    in reply to: Physics Nobel to Big Bangers #2410
    pluto
    Participant

    Hello Mark

    I posted a response. Than it went blank.

    Smile,,,,,,,,,,,,,be back later.

    in reply to: Physics Nobel to Big Bangers #2408
    pluto
    Participant

    Hello Mark

    1) There are galaxies moving towards each other, eg Andromeda and the Milky Way. The evolution of the Milky Way and the satellites that surround the milky way indicate a galactic collision.

    2) Arp should have been given greater respect.

    3) A quasar can be a dwarf or as huge as they come.
    Quarsar is a resultant star like body, its size is dependant on the compacted neucleon of the galaxy. Hubble noted that galaxies evolve from elliptical to spiral, main stream thinks spiral to elliptical.

    http://cas.sdss.org/dr6/en/proj/basic/galaxies/tuningfork.asp

    The Hubble Tuning Fork

    In the early 1900s, Edwin Hubble looked at galaxies like the ones you saw in the last few pages. Hubble classified the galaxies using a

    in reply to: Physics Nobel to Big Bangers #2406
    pluto
    Participant

    Hello Elling

    Tom is a very logical person.

    I think he is frustrated by the BiG Bang people and their ad hoc ideas.

    in reply to: Physics Nobel to Big Bangers #2405
    pluto
    Participant

    Hello Mark

    Which galaxy is moving away?

    Or are they all moving away.

    ==============================

    I know that there are some moving away and there are some moving towards us.

    There is no great pattern.

    Read this link

    http://thunderbolts.info/tpod/2004/arch/041018fingers-god.htm

    http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2004/arch/041001quasar-galaxy.htm

    in reply to: The recent "discovery" of Dark Matter #2403
    pluto
    Participant

    Hello All

    Dark Matter has been an issue for many years.

    Its the unseen matter that makes up most of the matter in the universe. Its degenerated matter in the form of ultra dense plasma matter. It is found in compacted cores such as Neutrons, quarks and the so called compacted matter that prevents ligt from escaping ( so called black Holes).

    in reply to: Physics Nobel to Big Bangers #2402
    pluto
    Participant

    Hello Mark

    With great respect.

    You said

    Firstly, the firm evidence for galactic recession reveals a universe homogeneous and isotropic i.e. with increasing mutual galactic recession, not just as seen from the Milky Way. In telescopes directed at opposite regions in the sky we can see objects moving away at more than 50% of the speed of light relative to us. Such objects on opposite sides of sky are receding from each other mutually faster than light. At this point you can start to understand that special relativity (SR) is bunk. See my profile for my published patent which works off experimental evidence that demonstrates that SR is false.

    There is no evidence of galactic recession. The error is in the readings by man. Get upto date info.

    In telescopes pointed out in opposite north and south and focused for about 1000000 secs on the size of a rice seed 13.2Gyrs no evidence of recession but a collection of super clusters of clusters of galaxies. Only the assumption from the Big Bang observers assuming that the universe is expanding.

    Observations of the universe and the images of star types and galaxies has given us a pattern of formation.

    Star bodies form clusters, that form into galaxies that form into cluster of clusters of galaxies and so on.

    When people talk about the expanding universe, they talk about time and space not the actual distance.

    pluto
    Participant

    Hello All

    Speed of the solar wind in my opinion is a gradient that depends on the size of the explosion and the combination of the average graviational pull of the sun. The compacted inner core of the sun is where the greatest mystery is.

    Prof Oliver Manuel has written some cutting edge info its worth reading. Just google and you will find it.

    in reply to: reference to electric field propulsion? #2249
    pluto
    Participant

    Hello All

    As for the sun

    Read the papers by Prof Oliver

    http://www.omatumr.com/papers.html

    and

    Micheal Mozina
    The Surface Of The Sun
    http://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 108 total)