Aneutronic Fusion
The ideal choice is aneutronic fusion. (A new...what?) "A" means "without"; "a-neutronic" means without neutrons as a byproduct. What is it about neutrons that makes such a difference? (And what's the catch?)
Fission and the trouble with Neutrons
When most people think of nuclear energy, they think of fission. With fission, a neutron splits a large atom into smaller ones, releasing more neutrons for a chain reaction. Control rods are required to soak up extra neutrons to avoid meltdown.
The Neutrons in fission generate heat. Heat turns water into steam, to spin a turbine. This generates electricity. So, nuclear power is fuel for an 18th century steam technology.
Conventional (neutronic) fusion - DT
Tritium is hydrogen with two extra neutrons. It doesn't occur in nature. It's rare, super expensive, radioactive and has proliferation dangers. A key challenge of neutronic fusion is how to breed tritium.
When deuterium nuclei fuse with tritium, they form an alpha particle (harmless Helium ion) and a neutron. Yes, that pesky neutron. The radioactive waste from fusion is less than fission, and shorter lived. But it is not eliminated.
The neutron generates heat which needs to be captured somehow and will likely heat water and produce steam to spin a turbine... Here again we have Space age technology to power 18th century steam engine.
Aneutronic Fusion: the best is yet to come.
| 1H + 2 6Li → |
| 1H + 7Li → |
| 3He + 3He → |
| 1H + 11B → |
Aneutronic fusion is fusion that does not produce neutrons as a product of the reaction.
There are several element combinations that can be used in aneutronic fusion. We'll look at the most likely one here: 1H + 11B aka pB11.
Note: H stands for hydrogen. A hydrogen nucleus is a single proton, hence "p" for proton also refers to hydrogen.

When a boron-11 nucleus fuses with a hydrogen nucleus - the result is three helium nuclei (aka "alpha particles") and energy, but no radioactive waste.

Voila! Getting rid of the neutrons gives you truly clean nuclear energy!
No proliferation possibilities at all (hence the peace sign!).
This is because: the fuel (boron and hydrogen) is not radioactive, the reaction product (helium) is not radioactive, and the reaction releases no neutrons (it's "aneutronic").

But wait! If there are no neutrons produced, where do you get heat for the steam engine?
You don't. The Helium ions coming out are positively charged - it's electricity directly.
This is a space age fuel that finally cuts the umbilical cord of steam.
Awesome! Where can I get my Aneutronic Fusion?
It's an awesome, burning energy challenge. A lot of people think it can't be done. They don't have much confidence in their fellow human beings. The physics - daunting. Perhaps even more difficult - the finances, the collective action problem to get adequate resources to mount a thorough investigation of this challenge.
Luckily, there are some scientists boldly exploring the frontiers of aneutronic fusion, including the crew working on the LPP Experiment. These projects need our support, they need our encouragement and they need our conscious commitment.
There are many reasons to pursue aneutronic fusion. You may be in it for the energy, or for saving the world, or for getting rid of nuclear weapons. On top of those practical reasons, this is about downloading the power of the stars, stealing fire from the gods, redeeming nuclear power. It's about showing the universe what we're capable of. Recent posts in this category
Fusion is not Fission
May 13, 2006Fission and Fusion are both Nuclear Energy. When people discuss nuclear power, they are usually referring to nuclear fission. This is because we have many nuclear power plants that use fission, but no one has been able to build a working fusion plant yet. The biggest practical difference between the two is that fusion reactions don’t have the problem of “chain reactions” and “melt-downs”.





Now in Forums








