Improvements in Firing and Instruments


Share
Posted by Rezwan on Apr 07, 2010 at 02:10 PM
Tools: Print | | chat (20) Comments

From LPP’s March 31 report:  “Improvements in Firing and Instruments Combine to Produce Encouraging Results”:

Right now, our most important instruments are the Time-Of-Flight (TOF) detectors that measure both neutrons and X-rays emitted by the plasmoid.  These detectors look at narrow beams of radiation that pass through the experimental room’s walls through 1” tubes.  Previously, alignment problems prevented us from seeing both signals clearly.  This month, we found that the detectors’ view of the plasmoid was partially blocked, making us think we were producing fewer neutrons and less X-rays than we were.  We’ve now fixed the alignment and expect to improve it still further in the next month after the arrival of a surveyor’s transit, a type of telescope ideally suited for alignments.

This realignment brought the TOF’s measurements of neutron flux into closer agreement with the measurements of total neutrons performed by the silver activation detector.  This agreement gives us more confidence in both measurements.

Using this new improvement in instrumentation, the LPP team has found that so far, over the range of currents from 500-800 kA, the neutron yield is following an I6 power scaling, exactly what our theory has predicted and considerably better than the I4 scaling obtained by most other researchers.

Equally important, the two TOFs working together have produced more evidence that we are already duplicating the high ion energies achieved with higher currents in the Texas experiments.  As the neutrons travel to the detector, they spread out, due to their different energies, which reflect the energies of the ions whose collisions produced the neutrons.  The more they spread out, the greater the ion energies.  Our measurements show that in our best shots, ion energies are in the range of 40-60 keV (the equivalent of 0.4-0.6 billion degrees K).  An example shot, 032510-07, is shown in the figure.

Figure 1: The spread of neutrons as they move shows their spread in velocity and thus the spread in energy of the ions colliding to produce them.  Here, the Near TOF (green line) at 11 meters from the plasmoid has a narrower spread in neutron arrival times than the Far TOF (purple line) at 17 meters.  Calculations based on these measurements indicate that in this shot, the average ion energy was around 57 keV (630 million degrees K).

Comparing how much X-ray energy is received at the two TOFs can give a measure of the average electron energy.  For relatively low energy X-rays, the air between the plasmoid and the detector filters them, so the ratio at each instant of the X-ray signal at the two detectors can be a measure of average X-ray energy.  This measurement is a bit more complicated, but indicates that peak electron energies are around 30 keV.

A third major new observation comes from a more low-tech measurement device—a depth gauge.  Accurate measurements of the depth of the hole in the central electrode, the anode, show that on average, the electron beam from each pinch vaporizes about 18 microns of copper.  This may not seem like a lot, but to do this, the electron beam must carry about 0.5 kJ of energy and the plasmoid must have about 1 kJ of energy, nearly half that stored in the magnetic field of the device.  So, this is evidence that a substantial part of the total energy available is being concentrated in the plasmoids and transferred to the beams.

 


Your involvement makes a big difference! Join online, or send checks payable to Focus Fusion Society, PO Box 232, South Bound Brook, NJ 08880.

Comments

For a more in depth discussion, start a thread in the forums.
There are (20) comments.



Brian H's avatar

I somewhat misspoke, I guess. Here’s a better summary:

“The electron beam heats the plasma ball, igniting fusion reactions between the hydrogen and boron; these reactions pump more heat and charged particles into the plasma. The energy in the ion beam can be directly converted to electricity�no need for conventional turbines and generators. Part of this electricity powers the next pulse, and the rest is net output.”


belbear's avatar

Brian,

This is indeed what I think is happening, but it ONLY happens inside the plasma ball, during its collapse and heating up to fusion temperature and density.

Once the beam is emitted, the plasma ball is emptying itself and whatever beta or alpha beams emerge from it are no longer useful for the fusion process, or even counterproductive for the next shot.

What we don’t need are electrode heating, erosion, hard EM radiation and remaining ionisation in the wrong place that, at the next discharge, can cause a misfire that won’t pinch.

It is energy that can and should be harvested.

This is the point I and Glenn wanted to prove.


Brian H's avatar

Yes, I’m aware of the issue, but can’t imagine any anode geometry that would permit such harvesting. The base of the anode is solid, and I don’t think it can be pierced with an exit or merged with a solenoid.


belbear's avatar

I thought it would be nothing more than drilling a hole in that solid base anode, the beam will pass right through.

An electron beam with 100KeV or more, emanating from a micron-sized source, is needle-thin and won’t even disperse at those few inches. Unless it already starts out as a conical beam, of course.

The solenoid or whatever decelerator used does not have to be inside the anode, it can be inside a vacuum-sealed drift tube mounted behind the anode hole. Since the anode is grounded (the cathode is the ‘hot’ side of the electrode system) this should not be impractical.


Brian H's avatar

I don’t have the specs or the math, but my understanding was that the base geometry and material was critical to control of the plasmoid, etc.

So I doubt very much that it’s doable, much less easy.


Glenn Millam's avatar

I’d be interested to hear Eric’s take on this. Surely they have contemplated this issue.


belbear's avatar

Only the experiment will prove…


Brian H's avatar

belbear??
The experiment? This is a basic anode design question. I know of no experiment to try one with a hole in it.


belbear's avatar

The experiment means that if you want to know if a hole in the anode has a large influence on the whole dpf process, is to take an (end-of-life) anode and drill a hole in its center. Not necessarily all the way through.
If you look at the pictures ofthe real thing, there is already a hole in the anode, to shape the pinch. Why would it not be possible to make this hole deeper, along the entire anode length?


Brian H's avatar

belbear;
the erosion is at the base of the anode; that’s solid.


Page 2 of 2 pages of comments  < 1 2

Post a Comment

Log In to comment.
Not a member? Register.

Notify me of follow-up comments?
The world needs fusion.
Fusion needs you!


Do Stuff!
Join!

or send checks payable to:
Focus Fusion Society
PO Box 232
South Bound Brook, NJ 08880


Join:
forums
twitter
facebook
rss feed
flickr
donate
Youtube
zotero
Focus Fusion Society on LinkedIn
google