Energy and Income


Share
Posted by Rezwan on May 07, 2009 at 03:16 PM
Tools: Print | | chat (13) Comments

Jim Trow, our new technical spokesperson, draws our attention to gapminder.org.  This software enables us to create a graph that shows the stark connection between energy consumption and poverty.


Click on the graph to visit an interactive version of this chart. With the interactive version, you can hover over the dots to identify the countries, "play" the graph forward and backward through time, and change the parameters of the data.

Each circle represents a country, and the size of the circle represents the size of the population. Yellow countries are in the Americas. Dark blue countries are in Africa. China is the big red circle, India is the big turquoise circle. As you can see, most people on our planet earn less than $4000 per year, and consume less than 4000 kWh of electricity per year.

The USA is the large yellow dot hovering at 14,000 kWh per person, with an average income around 40K. As you can see, Americans consume a lot more energy than the rest of the world.

To our credit, we don't consume the most energy per person. That honor is held by Norway and Iceland, the two dots to the far right of the graph. These folks consume almost twice the energy per person that Americans do.

This graph is linear. It doesn't look as stark when you use a logarithmic scale.

Here's a look at income vs. oil consumption in barrels per year.


According to this graph, Americans drink up 25 barrels of oil per person per year. Folks in Singapore guzzle 74 barrels per person. Wow! The folks in India are at 0.9 barrels per person per year.

The data doesn't tell us what total energy consumption is for electricity and oil - as some of the oil may be used for electricity generation.
Your involvement makes a big difference! Join online, or send checks payable to Focus Fusion Society, PO Box 232, South Bound Brook, NJ 08880.

Comments

For a more in depth discussion, start a thread in the forums.
There are (13) comments.



Brian H's avatar

Oops.  Where I am, cost would drop by 60% minimum.  Most places, much more.


My point was that either the 14 kWh figure represents the thermal energy required rather than the electrical energy, or the percentage of electrical cost fo the method I cited is less than 75%, or I got a bad figure from the web or misquated it, because 20+ cents per kWh is too high for anywhere.


Brian H's avatar

That’s what Californians get charged at higher usage levels, and is standard pricing in the UK and parts of Europe.  My percentage comparisons were for my own locale, though, where the price is about 6½¢/kwh.


Page 2 of 2 pages of comments  < 1 2

Post a Comment

Log In to comment.
Not a member? Register.

Notify me of follow-up comments?
The world needs fusion.
Fusion needs you!


Do Stuff!
Join!

or send checks payable to:
Focus Fusion Society
PO Box 232
South Bound Brook, NJ 08880


Join:
forums
twitter
facebook
rss feed
flickr
donate
Youtube
zotero
Focus Fusion Society on LinkedIn
google