Progress in Solving Switching Problems
Luckily for all of us, Eric Lerner writes updates, too. Here’s an update on the switch issue from Eric. Thanks Eric!
See also accompanying photos courtesy of yours truly. And note the headings are written by me - hopefully not perjorative. Now, back to Eric:
Summary of progress
We spent much of the month in initial shake-down and tuning of Focus-Fusion-1’s performance. We made good progress in solving problems with the switches that caused the capacitor bank to pre-fire before we could trigger it and for the current to rise too slowly. Problems such as these are routine for new experimental facilities and are to be expected. We expect to finish resolving the switch issues in December and begin moving on to our first major experimental campaign with the angular momentum coil.
Problems with Switches
In early testing of the FF-1 device, we saw that there were two problems associated with the spark gap switches that we purchased from a supplier.
- Pre-firing. Even at relatively modest charging voltages of 25kV, the switches pre-fired, meaning that one of the switches fired by itself before the bank had fully charged and before we initiated with the trigger.
- Timing. The onset of the current was much slower that we needed, and the switches were not firing at the same time.
How a switch works
The switch consists of two copper electrodes mounted on metal plates, with a slightly pressurized gas between them. The plates are screwed into a plastic insulator which also serves to contain the pressurized gas. In a hole in the upper electrode (which attached to the “hot” or upper plate of FF-1) is the tip of an automotive spark plug.
When the trigger generator fires, it creates a pulse of high voltage (HV) which travels through cables to the spark plugs in each of the switches. The negative HV pulse from the trigger adds to the positive HV sitting on the capacitor (which is in contact with the lower switch plate). This increased voltage causes the insulating gas to break down, electrons are stripped off of atoms, and the current begins to flow between the two electrodes.
Possible pre-firing culprit
We think we have identified the reason for the pre-firing. The plates of the switches that the copper electrodes protrude from are made of aluminum, a choice by the supplier that we were surprised at. Aluminum has a low melting point of 660 C and is a poor choice for any material exposed to plasma. We saw that most of the plates were heavily cratered and pitted, with the aluminum having melted and re-frozen into very rough surfaces. This scarring was caused by pre-fire arcs far from the copper electrodes and in turn produced a surface that encouraged more pre-firing.
Action taken for pre-firing
To prevent pre-firing we are having copper inserts made that will cover the aluminum plates in the entire area that they were exposed to the switch plasma. Copper’s melting point is 400 C higher. We had two such insert sets machined, and tested these two switches by themselves last week. As expected, this seems to have cured the pre-firing problem at least at low voltage. We fired 8 times at 20kV with only one pre-fire. We intend to continue testing next week at higher voltages, but are convinced that all switches need to have the copper plates made for them.
Action taken for slow firing
In the meantime, we heard from the supplier that he had made a mistake—again a very surprising one—in telling us to use nitrogen for the gas between the plates. This leads to the slow firing. Instead, we could get quick firing with “switch gas”, a mixture of SF6 and argon. So we expect this will solve the slow-firing problem when we receive the new gas this coming Thursday.

(18) Comments
Discuss In Forums
Gestation
Neutron Time of Flight Detectors









Comments
IMHO that supplier just took your money and screwed you with delivering some substandard crap that any handyman can slap together for a few bucks from leftover aluminum and a spark plug. Maybe better check out on some high-powered ignitron designs and build your own…
We used tubes for switching high voltage and currents, they are very reliable is there any reason that you can’t use a tube set up?
If the pressure in the switch is a little below atmospheric this can cause a lowering of the resistance across your switch, plus Pete is correct in that every thing needs to be smooth with no points any where.
Gurney;
What was the response time of the tubes? I think these switches have to react with 10s of ns precision and speed.
I didn’t realize that the response time has to be so short. So I found a patent that has a write up on how to make a high powered fast switching (20 nsec)tube. The complete patent is at this link.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4950962.html
It might be worth looking at.
http://www.epner.com/specplating_metals.ssi
these people specialize in plating surfaces with materials such as tungsten which would not melt or pit even with the high currents that your switches would be subject to.
Graphene! Cover ‘em with graphene!
Willit is right - if you can do tungsten, you have the best metal choice for non-melting/pitting. Will it be subject to oxidation, though, between cycles (servicing), or at the beginning…?
Another possibility is a conductive ceramic, such as they use in solid oxide fuel cell cathodes… Lanthanum Strontium Manganite (LSM in the literature) is one good example of a material that can be coated onto various substrates, via many methods (spray coat, dip coat, electroless deposition as per Willit’s link). By playing with the ceramic material properties, you can also make sure thermal expansion mismatches are minimized, so that these things have as long a practical life as possible… Of course, most of these ideas sound as if they are ripe for future project development, post net power production…
Page 2 of 2 pages of comments < 1 2
Post a Comment