Progress in Solving Switching Problems
Luckily for all of us, Eric Lerner writes updates, too. Here’s an update on the switch issue from Eric. Thanks Eric!
See also accompanying photos courtesy of yours truly. And note the headings are written by me - hopefully not perjorative. Now, back to Eric:
Summary of progress
We spent much of the month in initial shake-down and tuning of Focus-Fusion-1’s performance. We made good progress in solving problems with the switches that caused the capacitor bank to pre-fire before we could trigger it and for the current to rise too slowly. Problems such as these are routine for new experimental facilities and are to be expected. We expect to finish resolving the switch issues in December and begin moving on to our first major experimental campaign with the angular momentum coil.
Problems with Switches
In early testing of the FF-1 device, we saw that there were two problems associated with the spark gap switches that we purchased from a supplier.
- Pre-firing. Even at relatively modest charging voltages of 25kV, the switches pre-fired, meaning that one of the switches fired by itself before the bank had fully charged and before we initiated with the trigger.
- Timing. The onset of the current was much slower that we needed, and the switches were not firing at the same time.
How a switch works
The switch consists of two copper electrodes mounted on metal plates, with a slightly pressurized gas between them. The plates are screwed into a plastic insulator which also serves to contain the pressurized gas. In a hole in the upper electrode (which attached to the “hot” or upper plate of FF-1) is the tip of an automotive spark plug.
When the trigger generator fires, it creates a pulse of high voltage (HV) which travels through cables to the spark plugs in each of the switches. The negative HV pulse from the trigger adds to the positive HV sitting on the capacitor (which is in contact with the lower switch plate). This increased voltage causes the insulating gas to break down, electrons are stripped off of atoms, and the current begins to flow between the two electrodes.
Possible pre-firing culprit
We think we have identified the reason for the pre-firing. The plates of the switches that the copper electrodes protrude from are made of aluminum, a choice by the supplier that we were surprised at. Aluminum has a low melting point of 660 C and is a poor choice for any material exposed to plasma. We saw that most of the plates were heavily cratered and pitted, with the aluminum having melted and re-frozen into very rough surfaces. This scarring was caused by pre-fire arcs far from the copper electrodes and in turn produced a surface that encouraged more pre-firing.
Action taken for pre-firing
To prevent pre-firing we are having copper inserts made that will cover the aluminum plates in the entire area that they were exposed to the switch plasma. Copper’s melting point is 400 C higher. We had two such insert sets machined, and tested these two switches by themselves last week. As expected, this seems to have cured the pre-firing problem at least at low voltage. We fired 8 times at 20kV with only one pre-fire. We intend to continue testing next week at higher voltages, but are convinced that all switches need to have the copper plates made for them.
Action taken for slow firing
In the meantime, we heard from the supplier that he had made a mistake—again a very surprising one—in telling us to use nitrogen for the gas between the plates. This leads to the slow firing. Instead, we could get quick firing with “switch gas”, a mixture of SF6 and argon. So we expect this will solve the slow-firing problem when we receive the new gas this coming Thursday.

(18) Comments
Discuss In Forums
Gestation
Neutron Time of Flight Detectors









Comments
I assume the SF6 component is included to “extinguish” the argon ions more quickly? Sort of a ion scavanger?
Sabotage!!!!!11111!!!!1111!!!!
Probably not but I am curious,what’s up! Company not following your specs? Sending you an off-the-shelf device not to your specs? Inquiring minds want to know!
Copper looks like an OK material choice, but if you want to get rid of all prefiring you may have to scale up material costs to even higher MP noble (or nearly noble) metals like Ir or Ru (2500°C) or Pt (1775°C) vs. current Cu (1000°C) or pathetic Al (660°C). Sputter coating the aluminum or copper with these may give you a cheaper option that is durable enough
You can also try dipcoating (spray coating, spin coating) with sol gels & heat treating in H2or many other thin film techniques to get a suitable surface.
One additional thing you can do to your copper (if that’s what you go with) is simply electropolish it in phosphoric acid to further smooth it before you even use it if you think roughness causes pre-firing. It’s very fast & easy, can work for any size device, and there is lots of literature on it out there.
Resistance might be a problem with other materials
Probably not so much with the ones I suggested. All are excellent conductors. In ohm m:
Pt 1.1E-7
Ir 4.7E-8
Ru 7.1E-8
vs.
Al 2.7E-8
Cu 1.7E-8
However, Cu and Al both easily form air oxides, and the resistivity of these is much higher (e.g. Cu2O is > 1 ohm m). This may actually be contributing to the pre-firing: inhomogeneous oxides on either the Al plates or the Cu electrodes, leading to breakdown of the small number of more conductive sites. Oxides of alternate Ru & Ir are conductive (and thinner), and Pt is extremely thin.
Ag would be another option, with better conductivity and a lesser oxide problem than Cu…
Talking about Ag I wonder why ignitron’s a not used, is the power requirements too large?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignitron
Originally suggested by mchargue
Thanks for all the great pictures Rezwan!
You’re welcome, speedplane.
Note on plates - the copper inserts are working. They got two test plates back from Wolfgang, and set them up on FF1. Fired some shots, got some pinches over the weekend. Now to replace the rest.
Breakable, re “sabotage” - it’s more like suppliers are perhaps used to working with big government where cost is not an issue, and there’s no need to test things before you send them out. So the limited resources innovators who need each piece to work and don’t have a margin to play around are ... plagued.
This is another reason for setting up the new “plasma network” part of the site, so folks working on DPF’s can compare notes about supplies and sourcing and setting DPF standards.
Yay! Great news. I assume having a full set of Cu plates will greatly increase the likelihood of consistent pinching, no?
Page 1 of 2 pages of comments 1 2 >
Post a Comment