Explaining FoFu results using pure thermal arguments.
Posted: 17 September 2011 12:15 PM   [ Ignore ]
Old Timer
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  226
Joined  2010-06-10

Why I thought this? I remembered the cross sections for DD. At 200KeV it is 1/5 of the DT at this temperature. The simulations that correspond to FoFu yields in the version Lerner uses are for DT in other versions.
So, it seems that the results of FoFu can be explained by pure thermal reasons and not magnetic confining. So, increasing the specs won’t help much to increase the yields.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 September 2011 08:38 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  133
Joined  2006-08-01

Can you be a little more specific? Are you referring to the quantum magnetic field effect? If so, that is only projected to kick in when we switch to heavier ions.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 19 September 2011 01:49 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Old Timer
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  463
Joined  2009-12-13

optimal zone for p+B11 fusion is ~600 keV. i believe these temperatures would be unachievable without the quantum magnetic field effect.

When we compare thermal to magnetic regimes, Lindemuth seems an appropriate reference: http://fire.pppl.gov/fpa10_Fusion_principles_Lindemuth.pdf

Profile