2 of 2
2
Continuous energy production
Posted: 07 November 2010 11:08 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 16 ]
Old Croaker
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  999
Joined  2009-02-20

Very good points about safety, Rezwan. I’d like to add that in any conversation regarding safety, the questioner must specify the degree or specification (OSHA, IEEE, Mil-spec, etc), and preferably also specify the configuration(s) which are being asked about. Also, the person representing FF DPF should have a firm grasp that the water jacket covered with boron-10 and lead is designed specifically to reduce operating (not long-term) radiation to below background radiation levels.

Thus the question and response need not necessarily be about the LPPX envisionment for some remote and or military applications. Safety includes specifics.

 Signature 

“The Power To Get Things Done”

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 November 2010 01:54 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 17 ]
Old Croaker
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1429
Joined  2007-11-01

As per Aaron’s response, there are a wide range of possible initial (“pilot”?) installation types. It could even happen, IMO, that a foreign location is first off the mark.  In some ways, that would be a good thing, as it would demonstrate that there is a major international/global stake and dimension to FF’s potential. And it might put the fear of God and Mammon into some locals!

 Signature 

Help Keep The Planet Green: Maximize Your CO2 and CH4 Output!

Profile
 
 
   
2 of 2
2