What is the material basis of Quantum Consciousness ?

Will Physics explain Consciousness?
    ===.
Our brain works on dualistic basis:
usually consciousness (logically)  and rarely unconsciousness
( at first it seems illogically but at last it shows as very wise act)
In his last autobiographic article, Einstein wrote:
” . . . the discovery is not the matter of logical thought,
even if the final product is connected with the logical form”.
In book ‘ The Holographic Universe’  Michael Talbot
on page 160 explained this situation in such way: 
‘ Contrary to what everyone knows it is so, it may not be
the brain that produce consciousness, but rather consciousness
that creates the appearance of the brain ’
#
In our terrestrial world the Information ( some basis of Consciousness)
can be transfer to you only by Electromagnetic waves.
Lorentz proved: there aren’t Electromagnetic waves without Electron.
Therefore I say,
only Electron can be the Quantum of Information/ Consciousness.
We don’t have any other theory of Information’s transfers.
# We know the Electron is very important particle in our live.
It acts in Maxwell’s electrodynamics.
It acts in the atom.
But how Electron acts in cell and in Outer space we don’t know.
We need time to understand this fact.
And when we understand the Vacuum and Electron
we will know the Ultimate Nature of Reality, it means we
will know the material basis of Quantum Consciousness too.
==========.
Planck and Einstein found the energy of electron: E=h*f.
Sommerfeld found the formula of electron : e^2=ah*c,
it means:  e= +ah*c and e= -ah*c.
Dirac found two more formulas of electron’s energy:
+E=Mc^2 and -E=Mc^2.
Question.
Why does electron heed five ( 5 ) formulas?
====.
# Now nobody knows what the Electron is.
1
You know, it would be sufficient to really understand the electron.
    / Albert Einstein /
2 Tell me what an electron is and I’ll then tell you everything.
    / Somebody /
=====================.
More details.
# “... indeed an understanding of psi phenomena and of
consciousness must provide the basis of an improved
understanding of quantum mechanics.”
      /Evan Walker /
In my opinion it means that to answer to the question
‘ where the consciousness come from?’
we must understand not only the brain but electron too.
Once again.
Human brain works on two levels:
consciousness and subconsciousness. The neurons of brain
create these two levels. So, that it means consciousness and
subconsciousness from physical point of view ( interaction
between billions and billions neurons ). It can only mean
that the state of neurons in these two situations is different.
How can we understand these different states of neurons?
How does the brain generate consciousness?
We can understand this situation only on the quantum level,
only using Quantum theory. But there isn’t QT without
Quantum of Light and Electron. So, what is interaction between
Quantum of Light, Electron and brain ?  Nobody knows.
Therefore I say: we must understand not only the brain but electron too.
=================.
According to Pauli Exclusion Principle
only one single electron can be in the atom.
If the atom contains more than one electron
(for example - two), this atom represents ” Siamese twins”.
Save us, the Great God, of having such atoms, such cells.
And therefore the human brain has only one Electron.
Each of us has an Electron, but we do not know it.
As the ‘Bhagavad Gita’ says:
Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form.
They do not know My transcendental nature and
My supreme dominion over all that be.
/ Chapter 9. Text 11./
================== .
Best wishes
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
==================.
P. S.
Quantum physics meets biology.
/ By Markus Arndt, Thomas Juffmann, Vlatko Vedral /
http://www.univie.ac.at/qfp/publications3/pdffiles/Arndt2009a HFSPJ Quantum Bio Printed.pdf

/ and plus hundreds another articles about connection
between Quantum theory and Brain. /
==============================.

Socratus
Electron itself is a quantum of information

/ north Philosopher /
meaning ? explain further
========================.
1.
    Electron’s behavior is strange:
a)  Dualism of wave and particle.
b)  Interaction with vacuum.
c)  Interaction with photon.
    The strange electron’s behavior shows that
    electron is special particle.

2.
  Electron possess five (5) formulas for its existence
  It shows that electron is special particle.

3.
  To transfer information we need Em waves, it means electron.
  And only Electron !
  It shows that electron is special particle.
#   As poet Valery Brusov has written

But maybe these electrons are World,
where there are five continents:
the art,
knowledge,
wars,
thrones
and the memory of forty centuries.

/ The world of electron. / 
=========.

Roger Penrose wrote extensively on the possibility of the mind being a quantum computer in a book titled “The Emperor’s new Mind”. I don’t pretend to know enough to take a stand on this speculative subject one way or the other. But when I read his book quite a few years ago, it seemed to make sense.

I’m sorry old chap, it all sounds like nonsense.

Quantum physics meets biology.
http://www.univie.ac.at/qfp/publications3/pdffiles/Arndt2009a HFSPJ Quantum Bio Printed.pdf

What did the authors /  Markus Arndt, Thomas Juffmann, Vlatko Vedral /
talk about in their article?
# They interested only in one idea.
They try to understand the connection between
information, brain and quantum theory in living
  and not living systems.
Their conclusion is.
The interested of combination between Quantum physics
and Biology is growing but many experimental
demonstrations and theoretical explanation unclear.
They say, to understand this problem is timely and important for us.
========.
My layman’s conclusion.
1.
In the internet we can read hundreds theories of electron.
All of them are problematical.
Nobody knows what electron is.
2.
In the internet we can read hundreds articles about
connection between quantum theory, brain and information.
All of them are problematical.
3.
There is tendency for searching this truth.
4.
How I understand this problem.
Our brain works on dualistic basis:
usually consciousness (logically)  and rarely unconsciousness.
It means the interaction between billions and billions neurons
can be in two stats.
In the stat of consciousness (C ) or in the stat of unconsciousness ( U).
And we have information ( I ) which gives birth to thought and act
to person in the each of these two situations.
The question is:
How can the information or quantum of information transfer
( or be transfer) from the stat C to the state U and vice versa ?
Isn’t this question similar to the puzzle of quantum tunneling ?
Newton classic theory prohibits this process.
But quantum theory allows the particle to tunnel through the barrier.
The quantum tunneling is tunneling of one particle- electron.
So. 
How can electron transfer from the stats C to the state U and vice versa ?
What is electron ?
I think, electron itself is a quantum of information.
If somebody tries to understand the connection between information,
brain and quantum theory without electron, he is mistaken.
=====================.
Socratus

The process of conscious and unconscious.
My layman’s opinion.
===============================

There is a possibility of the brain activity to have
the ability to switch between conscious and unconscious.
But this process is suppressed by contact with the
cerebral cortex neurons (! ) which work in Maxwell’s regime. ( !)
( Electroencephalography shows us the Maxwell’s electrical
activity of the brain)
# To create ‘awareness’ having senses and thoughts is impossible.
The senses and thoughts increase the cerebral cortex neurons
impulses ( Maxwell’s EM energy ) and doesn’t give the ability
( of something ) to switch between conscious and unconscious.
# Maxwell’s electrical activity of the brain shows the
‘normal – not normal logical ‘ process in the brain.
To create ‘awareness/ unconscious ’ needs another
process – Quantum (!). ‘Awareness’ is Quantum process.
Very often it is only Quantum moment (!) but at this moment,
at this second the structure of cerebral cortex neurons is changes
and it means that the thought and behaviour of person changes too.
And then again the Maxwell’s electrical activity of the brain takes place.
# ” . . . the discovery is not the matter of logical thought,
even if the final product is connected with the logical form”.
    / Einstein /
===========================.
P.S.
Is an ‘awareness/ unconscious ’ equal to a ‘discovery / enlightenment ‘?
============.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
============================================.

As for consciousness and quantum effects, we have a very hard time reconciling either with the phenomenological world. It just seems unreasonably unreasonable that “stuff” should be aware of itself. Or that spooky action at a distance should be possible. Or that God should play dice with the universe. Or that a force particle from one object should transmit negative momentum (attraction) to another.

Damn universe just doesn’t want to make sense!

Perhaps, as an astrophysicist opined, not only is the universe weirder than we imagine, it is weirder than we can imagine! Which has always served as a challenge to the weirdest among us, such as the Socratuses of the world. 

‘It all depends on what the meaning of “is” is ....’

Brian H - 05 June 2010 12:33 PM

As for consciousness and quantum effects, we have a very hard time reconciling
either with the phenomenological world. It just seems unreasonably unreasonable
that “stuff” should be aware of itself. Or that spooky action at a distance should be possible.
Or that God should play dice with the universe.
Or that a force particle from one object should transmit negative momentum (attraction) to another.

Damn universe just doesn’t want to make sense!

Perhaps, as an astrophysicist opined, not only is the universe weirder than we imagine,
it is weirder than we can imagine! Which has always served as a challenge to the weirdest
among us, such as the Socratuses of the world. 

‘It all depends on what the meaning of “is” is ....’

#
We used to think that if we knew one, we knew two,
because one and one are two. We are finding
that we must learn a great deal more about `and’.
/Sir Arthur Eddington /

#
If there’s nothing wrong with me then,
maybe there’s something wrong with the Universe.
/ One physicist ./ 

=======================